Actual cervix length not pregnant-Closed Cervix: What Does it Mean If I’m Not Pregnant?

The cervix is the doorway between your vagina and uterus. The opening in the center of the cervix is called the os. During most of the month, your cervix produces a thick mucus that clogs up the os, making it difficult for sperm to enter your uterus. When you ovulate , however, your cervix produces a thin, slippery mucus. Your cervix may also soften or change position, and the os may open slightly.

Actual cervix length not pregnant

These two findings are consistent with another Brazilian study that Femme velo that the uterine cervix is significantly shorter in women younger than 20 years and primiparous. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, and you Actual cervix length not pregnant need to create a new Wiley Online Library account. Thus, the definition of reference ranges for cervical measurements during pregnancy, especially those showing lower limits percentiles 2. Services on Demand Journal. This appears to be associated with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity 18

Swing street new york city. BACKGROUND

Abstract Background: There is an inverse relation between the uterine cervical length during pregnancy and the frequency of preterm delivery. Descriptive values were presented for cervical length at every gestational week along with the results of parametric correlation and regression analysis. We should remember, however, that different pathways can lead to preterm delivery. July 15, at pm. Checking for a short cervix is not a routine prenatal test. Premature birth is when your baby is born too early, before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Your doctor may recommend reducing your level of activity if you begin having contractions before 37 weeks. What is the cervix? Most doctors will schedule women for a transabdominal ultrasound around 20 weeks. Actual cervix length not pregnant is standard to take the measurement three times over the course of several minutes.

KOKagan gmx.

  • There is an inverse relation between the uterine cervical length during pregnancy and the frequency of preterm delivery.
  • The length of cervix predicts the risk of preterm delivery.
  • Every pregnant woman is at risk for preterm birth, but most women think it will never happen to them.
  • Cervix length is most accurately measured by transvaginal ultrasound, which your doctor may not consider doing unless you specifically request it.
  • Please sign in or sign up for a March of Dimes account to proceed.

To determine cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation and the ideal mode of measurement of cervical length in cases of curved and straight cervical morphology. The uterine cervices of low-risk pregnant women were assessed using transvaginal ultrasound in a prospective cross-sectional study. In women with straight uterine cervices, cervical biometry was performed in a continuous manner.

In women with curved uterine cervices, the biometry was performed using both the continuous and segmented techniques in segments joining the cervical os. Polynomial regression models were created to assess the correlation between the cervical length and gestational age.

The paired Student t-test was used to comparemeasuring techniques. Up to the 21st week of gestation, there was a predominance of curved uterine cervix morphology Cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks was represented by a linear regression, independently of the measuring mode. The ideal measuring technique was the transvaginal ultrasound performed at a gestational age 21 weeks.

Prematurity is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A short uterine cervix is a predictor of premature birth; therefore, its morphological and biometric assessment is important. Cervical assessment is performed by clinical examination and ultrasound. It is, therefore, a subjective assessment of the cervix, and it can underestimate the actual cervical length by up to 12 mm.

There is no consensus among authors regarding the value of cervical length that is considered short and the associated risk for premature labor, the reported values varying between 20 and 25 mm. The evaluation of uterine cervical morphology is important because it is technically more difficult to measure cervical length in cases of curved uterine cervices, and the best measuring method in these cases is still controversial.

When the uterine cervix has a straight morphology, its measurement is performed in a continuous manner, that is, along the cervical canal. When the cervix is curved, the biometric measurement may be performed in two ways: 1 in a continuous manner, for example, from the internal os to the external os of the cervix; and 2 in a segmented manner, such as, by dividing the cervix into segments, with the measured cervical length being the sum of these segments. Routine evaluation of uterine cervical length during the second trimester morphological ultrasound is an important method to screen for preterm labor because most women do not have risk factors.

The objectives of the present study were to assess the cervical biometry between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation and to analyze the influence of uterine cervical morphology straight or curved on the measuring technique for cervical length, for example, segmented or continuous. This was a prospective and cross-sectional study of transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the uterine cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation.

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution and a signed informed consent was obtained from patients who agreed to participate voluntarily. The patients received an explanation on the importance of assessing the uterine cervix and its relationship with premature labor and associated complications.

The inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation, with gestational age determined by the date of last menstruation and confirmed by ultrasound performed up to the 13 th week. After undergoing the second semester morphological ultrasound, the pregnant women were instructed to completely empty their bladders and remain in the gynecological position to undergo transvaginal examination with an endocavity transducer of 5—6.

The transducer was covered with a lubricant and gel-free condom and was inserted into the anterior vaginal fornix. This method allowed observing the morphology of the uterine cervix straight or curved , the internal and external os of the cervix, and the endocervical canal surrounded by the cervical gland area. Continuous biometry was performed for straight uterine cervices, in which the examiner placed one measuring caliper in the internal os and another in the external os Fig.

For curved uterine cervices, the examiner used two measurement techniques; the continuous technique as described above and the segmented technique, in which the first measuring caliper was placed in the internal cervical os, the second caliper was placed at the beginning of the cervical bend, and the last caliper was placed in the external cervical os Fig. The sum of these segments was described as the length of the uterine cervix.

All measurements were performed by only two experienced examiners. The qualitative variables gestational age, number of gestations, number of vaginal deliveries, maternal age, ethnicity, smoking, curved cervix, and straight cervix were expressed as absolute and relative values, whereas the quantitative variables cervical length measured by both the continuous and the segmented techniques were expressed as means, standard deviations SD , medians, and minimum and maximum values.

Polynomial regressions were performed to evaluate the correlation between cervical length and gestational age, and the quality of fit was assessed using the coefficient of determination R 2. The measurements of the uterine cervix performed using the continuous and segmented techniques were compared using the paired Student t -test. The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software version The assessment included pregnant women at gestational ages between 18 and 24 weeks, with the following distribution: 87 The mean maternal age was The results of the continuous cervical biometry varied from The results of the segmented cervical biometry varied from Tables 1 and 2 show the percentiles 5, 10, 50, 90, and 95 of the cervical length, using the continuous and segmented techniques as a function of gestational age, respectively.

Of these pregnant women, Table 4 shows the distribution of curved and straight cervical morphology between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation. According to Fig. Until the late s, the methods of assessing the uterine cervix consisted basically of subjective methods, namely direct observation through speculum examination and vaginal bidigital palpation.

With the advent of the transvaginal ultrasound, in the early s, the morphology and biometry of the uterine cervix have been increasingly studied, which led to a thorough investigations for the assessment of physiological changes during pregnancy. In the present study, by means of transvaginal ultrasound, we determined reference values for cervical length between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation; our sample was a Brazilian population at low risk for preterm labor, with a small variation within this gestational interval.

Jafari-Dehkordi et al 15 determined reference values for cervical length between 8 and 38 weeks of gestation using abdominal ultrasound in Iranian women. The mean cervical length did not show much difference between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation A recent study established conditional intervals of cervical length using transvaginal ultrasound between 11 and 40 weeks in 4, Greek women. They observed that the best correlation between uterine cervical length and gestational age was a second-degree equation and the mean length between 18 and 24 weeks changed from The values did not vary significantly with gestational age and the mean length was 37 mm in this gestational interval.

In the randomized controlled trial, the mean cervical length between 20 and 25 weeks of gestation was 33 mm. This value was lower than the one found in our study 38 mm ; however, there are several differences between both studies, such as low versus unselected population different number of cases versus 24, and type of pregnancy singleton versus singleton and twin. With regard to morphology, there was a predominance of curved uterine cervices.

The results of this study are in line with our findings, namely the results of This morphology may be explained by local changes in collagen concentration in the uterine cervix during the first trimester of gestation. We used two measuring techniques to determine the cervical length: continuous and segmented. In women with a straight uterine cervix the measurements did not differ significantly; however, cervical biometry is hindered when the continuous technique is used in women with a curved cervix because the cervical length is often underestimated.

According to the literature, the segmented technique, when performed along the endocervical canal, yields slightly higher yet more accurate values. So, in the interval between the 18 th and the 24 th weeks of gestation, the ideal gestational age for measuring the curved uterine cervix was the 21 st week using transvaginal ultrasound.

At this stage, the phenomenon of uterine conversion has already occurred and the straight cervical morphology predominates; accordingly, biometric measurements are easier to perform and are more accurate. As limitation, neither intra- nor inter-observer reproducibility were performed.

However, all measurements were taken by only two experienced examiners, which could decrease this reproducibility. Furthermore, all cervical length measurements were performed by transvaginal route. In conclusion, we determined reference values for uterine cervical length between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation in a Brazilian low-risk population using the continuous and segmented techniques.

The values did not vary significantly with gestational age. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing in threatened preterm labor. A sonographic short cervix as the only clinical manifestation of intra-amniotic infection.

Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Reference values for the cervical length measurement in the second trimester of pregnancy using the transvaginal ultrasound in a large Brazilian population. Reference range for cervical length throughout pregnancy: non-parametric LMSbased model applied to a large sample.

A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Cervical length and cervicovaginal HCG for prediction of pre-term birth in women with signs and symptoms of pre-term labour. Evaluation of additive effect of quantitative fetal fibronectin to cervical length for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth among asymptomatic low-risk women.

Transvaginal sonographic cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature. Universal cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention in the United States. Implementing universal cervical length screening in asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies: challenges and opportunities.

Definition of anatomical planes for use in transvaginal sonography. Reference range of the weekly uterine cervical length at 8 to 38 weeks of gestation in the center of Iran. Cervical length at weeks: unconditional and conditional longitudinal reference ranges. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. Second-trimester cervical sonography: features other than cervical length to predict spontaneous pretermbirth. Dynamic collagen changes in cervix during the first trimester and decreased collagen content in cervical insufficiency.

Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix.

Andrade S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Services on Demand Journal. Abstract Purpose To determine cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation and the ideal mode of measurement of cervical length in cases of curved and straight cervical morphology. Methods The uterine cervices of low-risk pregnant women were assessed using transvaginal ultrasound in a prospective cross-sectional study.

Conclusion Cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks was represented by a linear regression, independently of the measuring mode.

Introduction Prematurity is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Methods This was a prospective and cross-sectional study of transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the uterine cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation.

Results The assessment included pregnant women at gestational ages between 18 and 24 weeks, with the following distribution: 87 Discussion Until the late s, the methods of assessing the uterine cervix consisted basically of subjective methods, namely direct observation through speculum examination and vaginal bidigital palpation. Conclusion In conclusion, we determined reference values for uterine cervical length between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation in a Brazilian low-risk population using the continuous and segmented techniques.

Received: April 04, ; Accepted: September 09, Contributors Andrade S. Conflicts to Interest Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abdominal cerclages have been performed during and prior to pregnancy and generally are done after failed vaginal procedures. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability. In addition, the minimum and maximum length of cervix in each trimesters were 27 and 49 mm, 29 and 51 mm, 28 and 53 mm, respectively. What is a short cervix?

Actual cervix length not pregnant

Actual cervix length not pregnant

Actual cervix length not pregnant

Actual cervix length not pregnant. INTRODUCTION

Nulliparous women carrying a single foetus of confirmed gestational age were included; subjects were finally considered for generation of normative data, excluding those delivering earlier than 37 or later than 42 wk. Other exclusion criteria were history of cerclage, any previous cervical surgery, smoking, or any medical disorder complicating pregnancy. Cervix length at each week of gestation gradually decreased over the study period.

Length at 20 and 34 wk was The overall shortening over this 14 wk period was 5. Pearson's correlation coefficient was - 0. The serial normative data generated in our setting can be used to decide cut-off points for predicting risk of preterm labour in future studies.

Validity of such prediction needs to be tested in larger cohorts of women assessed at specific gestational ages. The risk of spontaneous preterm labour and delivery increases in women who have a short cervix 1. Transvaginal ultrasound TVS can be used as an objective and reproducible method to measure cervical length throughout pregnancy. The gestational age at which cervical length is measured by TVS affects calculation of the risk of spontaneous preterm birth 2.

There is need for developing charts of cervical lengths, stratified by gestational age throughout pregnancy, in order to predict preterm labour. Several large studies have been carried out with measurements of the cervical length at fixed dates of 22 to 24 or 28 wk of gestation 1 , 3 , 4. However, there are only a few reliable charts for low risk population, covering measurements at successive gestation weeks. Normative data for mean or median cervical lengths, along with corresponding measures of dispersion, stratified by gestational age, will not only help to monitor ongoing cervical changes but also to predict risk of preterm birth at any time of presentation.

In future, when definitive interventions for prevention of preterm birth are expected to be available, it would be perhaps ethically unacceptable to withhold treatment if such normative data indicate substantial risk.

Population based charts will also be useful to rule out false preterm labour, thereby obviating unnecessary hospitalizations and irrational use of corticosteroids and tocolytics. As has been pointed out by Leitich et al 5 , mean cervical length, in addition to showing intersubject variability, appears to vary with ethnic identity. Consequently, it may be even more relevant to describe reference values of cervical lengths in various ethnic groups.

However, at present there is lack of such data for the Indian population. We therefore, conducted a study to establish normal cervical lengths using TVS, between 20 and 34 wk of gestation, for nulliparous women carrying a single foetus of confirmed gestational age.

Only women who delivered between 37 to 42 wk were included in establishing the standard values. Consecutive nulliparous pregnant women were recruited between April, and May, in the antenatal outpatient department once a week of R. The institutional ethics committee approved the study protocol and only those participants who provided written, informed consent were enrolled.

A cohort of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies, and confirmed gestational age by first or early second trimester ultrasonography, were selected to undergo transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length between 20 and 34 wk gestation.

Funneling was not taken as a criterion in this study as it is always associated with shortening of the cervix and does not provide any additional benefit in the prediction of preterm delivery 6 , 7. Women beyond 34 wk were not included because antenatal corticosteroids are widely used up to 34 wk, therefore, there is no clinical implication even if patient goes into labour.

The subjects were followed up for outcome of pregnancy and only the subset of women determined retrospectively who delivered between 37 to 42 wk was included for calculation of normal data for cervical length. Exclusion criteria were preterm labour or post-term pregnancy, induced labour, multiple pregnancy and history of cerclage or surgical intervention upon the cervix prior to pregnancy.

Although cervical length measurements were carried out for every week from 20 to 34 wk gestation, each woman underwent only a single cervical length measurement.

Transvaginal sonography was done by a 7. The probe was covered with a latex condom and gel placed between the transducer and the cover and also on the surface. It was then gently inserted in the vagina to obtain a sagittal view of the cervix. An adequate image for the measurement of cervical length was defined as the visualization of the internal os, external os and endocervical canal.

The image was then frozen and cervical length measured, with electronic calipers, as the linear distance between the external os and the internal os along a closed endocervical canal.

In instances where the cervical canal was curved, its length was assessed as the sum of the lengths of two contiguous linear segments, placed along the endocervical canal, connecting the external os and the internal os.

The cervical length was measured thrice in each subject and the shortest of the three measurements was recorded 1. The average time for examining one patient was 5 min. To maintain consistency and to reduce interobserver variation, all the measurements were carried out by a single ultrasonologist. Data were captured on predesigned structured case report form.

Descriptive values were presented for cervical length at every gestational week along with the results of parametric correlation and regression analysis.

A total of nulliparous women were screened by TVS between 20 and 34 wk of gestation. The gestational age was confirmed by ultrasonography in the first trimester in Of these, subjects The mean maternal age was The number of subjects studied at each gestational week, along with the corresponding descriptive statistics for cervical length, as assessed by TVS, are presented in the Table and Fig.

The cervical length for each week of gestation gradually decreased over the study period. At 20 wk the 11 measurements gave a mean length of Box and whisker plots of cervix length by transvaginal ultrasonography, stratified by gestational age, in nulliparous urban Indian women.

Values falling outside a whisker length of 1. Association between cervical length and gestational age showed strong inverse correlation. Pearson's correlation coefficient r value was - 0. The coefficient of determination r 2 value of 0. Relationship between cervix length by transvaginal ultrasonography and gestational age in nulliparous urban Indian women. This study was performed with measurements taken from a cohort of urban women with low risk of preterm labour attending an antenatal clinic, with the goal of generating normative data.

Transvaginal measurement of cervical length has been reported for Indian women, but with different goals, such as prediction of outcome of induction of labour in women of 34 - 42 wk gestational age 8 , and prediction of the risk of preterm birth in asymptomatic women at high risk of such outcome 9. We generated normative data from women at no special risk of preterm birth. Our study showed that the cervical length gradually decreased, as gestational age advanced from 20 to 34 wk, and that there was significant inverse relationship between the two.

Some researchers 10 , 11 have found that cervical length remains unchanged up to the third quarter and then becomes progressively shorter while others 12 — 15 maintain that cervical length starts to decrease in the second quarter. Two longitudinal studies conducted between the 12 th and 39 th wk did not show any changes in cervical length throughout the period considered 16 , Iams et al 1 found that the length of the cervix at 24 and 28 wk were Our study had corresponding values of The shorter cervical lengths in the earlier study could be due to the different racial profile, and the inclusion of subjects with higher baseline risk of preterm delivery and with funneling, both of which were exclusion criteria for the present study.

The values of cervical lengths given by other researchers are however, similar to those from our study 12 , 14 , 17 , There is an inverse relation between the uterine cervical length during pregnancy and the frequency of preterm delivery. The purpose of this study was to construct a chart and evaluate the cervical length at 8 to 38 weeks of normal gestation in the center of Iran. Uterine cervical length was measured on asymptomatic pregnant women by abdominal ultrasonographic technique. For statistical evaluation, regression analysis and calculation of percentiles were performed.

Our data show a significant decrease in uterine cervical length with increasing gestational age. The mean shortening of the uterine cervical length between the second and the ninth months was Also, the cervical length means in trimesters 1, 2 and 3 were New charts with the 5 th , 10 th , 50 th , 90 th , and 95 th percentile are presented.

Our study provides a new chart and reference values for normal uterine cervical length throughout gestation based on a large sample in the center of Iran. There was a progressive decrease in mean uterine cervical length with increasing gestational age in the population of this study. Our established charts for uterine cervical length throughout gestation might be more useful than a single cut-off value for more efficient prevention and management of preterm birth.

Measuring of cervical length and finding of cervical funneling may be of particular value in predicting and managing of placenta previa, preterm labor, and cervical incompetence. A large amount of the evidence indicates that there is an inverse relation between the length of the uterine cervix during pregnancy and the frequency of preterm delivery.

The relative risk of preterm birth increases with decreasing cervical length. Transabdominal sonography does not need additional equipment, is well-accepted by women, and provides a noninvasive method of detecting individuals at risk for preterm. There are some reasons for the necessity to improve longitudinal charts of cervical length during normal gestation. Firstly, there are different reports about the longitudinal changes of the uterine cervical length, and secondly uterine cervical length seems to differ in various populations.

These studies have reported different uterine cervical length in pregnancy in the same weeks and months. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study on the normal pattern of change in uterine cervical length during normal pregnancy in the center of Iran. On the other hand, reference ranges established throughout gestation might be more useful than a single cut-off value for more efficient prevention and management of preterm birth.

Therefore, this study constructed charts and evaluated cervical length means and percentiles for uterine cervical length at 8 to 38 weeks of the normal gestation in the center of Iran Isfahan by transabdominal ultrasound device. This study was conducted between March and February The exclusion criteria were major fetal abnormalities, regular pain, a history of ruptured membranes, abruption placenta, uterine structural abnormalities, cervical cerclage, placenta previa, polyhydramnios.

In our study the cases were not followed up. Transabdominal ultrasound was performed using a Voluson expert machine of GE Company. The bladder of participants was semi distended to displace the fetal head superiorly.

The cervix was viewed as an echogenic line extending from the internal to external os. All measurements were done three times for at least 5 min and measured by a single radiologist expert in this field in a sagittal plane and a mean of the three times was taken.

The study was approved by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee and all volunteers gave their written consent. Regression analysis was used for the mean uterine cervical length and weeks of gestation assessments. For practical use of uterine cervical length charts, we interpolated our data.

The mean, the 5 th and 95 th percentiles were fitted by a quadratic curve. In this study, the mean maternal age of subjects was Also, the regression line between uterine cervical length and weeks of gestation is shown in Figure 2.

There is a spontaneous shortening in the pregnant women cervix from the beginning to the termination of pregnancy. The mean uterine cervical length exhibited minimal changes from 10 to 24 weeks for most pregnant volunteer subjects in this study. The average shortening of the uterine cervical length between the second and the ninth months was Also, the mean of uterine cervical length in trimesters 1, 2 and 3 were In addition, the minimum and maximum length of cervix in each trimesters were 27 and 49 mm, 29 and 51 mm, 28 and 53 mm, respectively.

Cervical length measurements corresponding to the 5 th , 10 th , 50 th , 90 th , and 95 th centiles against gestational age are shown in Figure 4.

Also, the mean, the 5 th and 95 th percentiles were fitted by a quadratic curve [ Figure 5 ]. The mean uterine cervical length changes from 2 to 9 months. The mean uterine cervical length in trimesters. Interpolation quadratic curves for mean B , the 5 th C and 95 th A percentiles. Transabdominal ultrasound is an original method for visualizing the gravid cervix although there are limitations for the abdominal approach, including the following: a the apparent artificial lengthening of the cervix resulting from the patient's filled bladder, and b the difficulty of visualizing a shortened cervix.

Despite these limitations, several recent studies[ 3 , 5 ] have reported the clinical benefit of transabdominal assessment of uterine cervical length[ 7 ] in that it is accurate and more acceptable to some patients than cervical evaluation via a transvaginal probe. Additionally, transabdominal assessment of uterine cervical length is less invasive, less cumbersome, and well accepted by patients compared with transvaginal assessment.

In recent decade, large studies with measurements of the uterine cervical length were performed on asymptomatic women in different weeks of gestation. Nevertheless, there are different cut off levels and different definitions of preterm birth in different populations. Preterm delivery is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, especially, in the United States.

On the other hand, Andersen et al. Also, Ozdemir et al. Additionally, Carvalho et al. They reported the mean uterine cervical length In another study Carvalho et al. In our study, the mean of uterine cervical length in trimesters 1, 2 and 3 were In another study, median uterine cervical length in the second trimester was reported to be mm which is consistent with our results. Also, Hibbard et al.

Besides, based on large number of observational studies in low-risk populations, it proposed that the 50 th percentile of the cervical length is 35 mm at 24 weeks of gestation,[ 9 ] which is consistent with our results in the same week 37 mm at 24 weeks. In a recent study in Greece,[ 16 ] Souka et al. As mentioned before, the uterine cervical length can be affected by parity, age, gestational age, race, and populations. Therefore, it seems that we need different charts for uterine cervical length throughout gestation in various populations based on maternal characteristics, age, gestational age, race and etc.

These charts can be used for observing women at high risk for preterm delivery and for clearly identifying a significant deviation or decline in the centiles for these subjects. Our study provides new charts and reference values for normal uterine cervical length throughout gestation based on a large sample in the center of Iran.

To define transvaginal ultrasound reference ranges for uterine cervix measurements according to gestational age GA in low-risk pregnancies. Cohort of low-risk pregnantwomen undergoing transvaginal ultrasound exams every 4 weeks, comprisingmeasurements of the cervical length and volume, the transverse and anteroposterior diameters of the cervix, and distance fromthe entrance of the uterine artery into the cervix until the internal os.

The inter- and intraobserver variabilities were assessed with the linear correlation coefficient and the Student t-test. Within each period of GA, 2. Mean values and Student t-test were used to compare the values stratified by control variables.

After confirming the high reproducibility of the method, women followed in this cohort presented a reduction in cervical length, with an increase in volume and in the anteroposterior and transverse diameters during pregnancy. Smaller cervical lengths were associated with younger age, lower parity, and absence of previous cesarean section C-section. In the studied population, we observed cervical length shortening throughout pregnancy, suggesting a physiological reduction mainly in the vaginal portion of the cervix.

In order to better predict pretermbirth, cervical insufficiency and premature rupture of membranes, reference curves and specific cut-off values need to be validated. Approximately 15 million preterm births occur per year globally. These countries, including Brazil, are responsible for the largest number of preterm births in the world.

Twin pregnancies or pregnancies with a history of preterm births are groups at a higher risk for preterm birth. A strategy for the early identification of women at higher risk of preterm birth is monitoring the physiological changes preceding labor. Cervix alterations, which start a few weeks before labor, are a consequence of biochemical mechanisms that will culminate with cervical effacement and labor.

Cervical shortening, when diagnosed ultrasonographically between weeks 20 and 24, is an important risk factor for preterm birth. Along with the previous history of preterm birth, the measurement of the cervical length by transvaginal ultrasound US scan is currently the most appropriate available parameter for the prediction of preterm birth. It is highly recommended in several widely recognized guidelines, since there is evidence on interventions that may reduce the risk of prematurity.

Since at least two decades ago, there is a consensus regarding the concept that the shorter the cervix, the higher the risk of prematurity. However, there are still divergences regarding the parameter to be considered as the best cut-off point for the prediction of preterm birth in different populations, with values ranging from less than 25 mm 16 17 18 19 20 to less than 15 mm.

Some authors suggest that the cervical length varies according to the population, and that may imply different risks that also depend on the specific gestational ages GAs. With an US evaluation, it would be possible to establish standards for a reference population, thus enabling the identification of the early changes that lead to labor. The purpose of this study was to define reference ranges for values of US measurements of the uterine cervix among low-risk pregnant women with GAs between 12 and 36 weeks, and to discuss these findings in the light of the current knowledge.

This was a prospective cohort study involving a single group of low-risk pregnant women. The study was conducted over a period of 18 months to allow the necessary number of pregnant women to be included and monitored until delivery. Complete information on the measurements of the cervix of all participating women was collected, as well as information on epidemiology, evolution of pregnancy and childbirth.

Women with any obstetric or clinical pathological conditions that could be associated with spontaneous or induced preterm birth, such as diabetes, hypertension, heart and rare diseases, with risk factors for preterm birth, such as a history of prematurity, cerclage, recurrent miscarriage, uterine cervix surgery, uterine malformation, uterine myomatosis, fetal malformation, and premature rupture of membranes were excluded.

The development of any of the aforementioned conditions during pregnancy was considered a reason to exclude the pregnant women from the study, but all data collected until that moment were considered in the analysis. The calculation of the sample size considered the mean cervical length of The number needed to assess the mean length of the uterine cervix was calculated individually for each GA range, and the largest estimated size was chosen, that is, women for the 33—week period.

The measurements obtained by US examination for each pregnant woman was the uterine cervix length, using the technique proposed by the Fetal Medicine Foundation, with the addition of a degree rotation of the transducer, focusing the middle third of the cervix to enable the measurement of the transverse and anteroposterior diameters Fig.

Finally, the distance between the entrance of the right or left uterine arteries into the uterine cervix until the internal os was also evaluated, using an oblique cross section to determine the supravaginal length of the cervix. A-A: cervical length from the internal os IO to the external os EO , with the cervical channel arrow. B-B: Antero-posterior AP diameter of the uterine cervix.

A-A: transverse diameter of the uterine cervix. The study was evaluated and approved by the Institutional Review Board of our institution letter of approval number — The pregnant women were identified among those attending prenatal care at the outpatient clinic, who were then invited to participate in the study. After agreeing to participate, they signed an informed consent form and underwent the first US exam.

After that, the women had US exams scheduled monthly, which coincided with their prenatal care visits. The study followed all principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, which was reviewed in All the pregnant women had US exams performed by the same examiner. Only the group of women participating in the pilot study underwent the second exam, on the same day, performed by a different examiner, for the assessment of the interobserver variability; the exam was subsequently performed again by the first examiner for the assessment of the intraobserver variability.

In those two situations, the observers were blind to all measurements to avoid the possibility of being biased by the knowledge of the previous measurements. For the data analysis, a normal distribution was assumed for all collected data.

The variability was considered the lowest the highest was the linear correlation coefficient r when crossing the two measurements for all of the pregnant women.

Reference ranges curves were then defined for the uterine cervix measurements, which were summarized by points at each four-week interval of GA, starting at week 12 until week The curves were constructed from the medians of the measurements percentile 50 and the confidence interval CI that determined the maximum percentiles 90 and A comparison of the values was performed with the Friedman non-parametric analysis of variance throughout GA since the residuals did not have a normal distribution for repeated measurements of the same subject.

Their mean values and SDs were compared using the Student t -test. For the pilot study, 38 women were evaluated. Table 1 shows a small variability, from 0. A total of pregnant women were included in the study, and concluded their participation with complete data, although not all of them underwent all the 6 planned exams. Of the 29 losses They were then excluded from the analysis. Upon admission to the study, the majority of women were between 20 and 24 years of age, white, married or had a partner, and had finished primary school.

One-fourth of them had a history of abortion or C-section. A small minority smoked regularly during pregnancy Table 2.

The measurements of the uterine cervix length decreased slowly, yet significantly, with GA. However, the values regarding the distance between the entry point of the uterine artery into the cervix until the internal os showed a very slight increase variation with GA Table 3 , Fig. The measurements of the anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the cervix, as well as the estimated cervical volume, showed a small but significant increase with the progression of GA Table 4 , Figs.

The measurements of the uterine cervix length were controlled according to some possibly confounding factors. Table 5 shows that the cervical length had significantly higher values for women over 25 years of age, with 1 or more previous deliveries, and with a previous C-section. This was one of the few studies on cervical length measurements conducted among a Brazilian population involving a prospective evaluation throughout pregnancy until childbirth with a dependent sample strictly defined as low-risk.

A detailed evaluation of multiple US parameters was conducted, enabling the definition of reference range curves for those measurements with percentile values, especially for the cervical length, which is more useful and applicable in practice.

For decades, there has been great concern about the heterogeneity observed in studies of the uterine cervix for the prediction of preterm birth. Currently, there still is some debate on the differences observed in uterine cervix measurements regarding different populations, the GA at screening, the recommended periodicity for the US exams, and even regarding how their outcomes should be evaluated.

Although this cohort was specifically followed in a single service, the examination technique used in this study was similar to what is currently practiced. Discussions are likely to be raised concerning some issues of this study, such as the characteristics of the women cared for in this healthcare facility, and whether the sample represents the population of low-risk pregnant women in the country, which could be a limitation of the study.

We found that the technique used in this study was appropriate for the purposes of the investigation, especially considering that inter- and intraobserver variabilities were low. Among all cases followed-up until the end of pregnancy, not a single preterm birth occurred. If the selection of a very specific population may imply, on one hand, limitations for generalizations, on the other hand, the absence of preterm births can be understood as a benchmark, allowing to adequately show the physiology of the natural shortening of the uterine cervix in fully regular gestations.

The length of the uterine cervix showed a statistically significant decrease during pregnancy. The 50th percentile ranged from In a similar Brazilian study, 24 the authors found 36 mm for the 50th percentile at week 23, and 29 mm at week These values are smaller than the ones from our study, and that could possibly be explained by the fact that the aforementioned study had a preterm birth rate of 8.

However, despite the difference, the same pattern of cervical shortening was observed with GA. The uterine cervix seems to become slightely longer with maternal age, even though no changes were observed in its anteroposterior and transverse diameters.

However, these values increased also with parity. These two findings are consistent with another Brazilian study that demonstrated that the uterine cervix is significantly shorter in women younger than 20 years and primiparous. These findings may suggest that pregnancies are most likely to cause an increase in the length of the cervix, and then the age and history of C-section would be just confounding factors for this association, since they are also parity-related.

The values of the anteroposterior and transverse diameters also presented a minor increase with GA, outlining an assumption that the shortening and enlargement of the cervix could occur, simultaneously and physiologically, with the increase in GA. The volume also presented a minor increase during pregnancy, which was statistically significant, from 28 cm 3 at 12—16 weeks to 39cm 3 at 33—36 weeks. This could even explain the reason why several shortened uterine cervices during pregnancy did not result in preterm births.

In Fig. In addition, other studies involving much larger populations also concluded that the cervical length decreased significantly with GA. Another issue refers to the actual clinical relevance of a small difference found in cervical length when comparing two measurements.

A difference of 2 mm, for instance, is in fact greater than the inherent variability of the measurement method 0. Our hypothesis is that, although there is a difference, it should be interpreted within a natural physiological development of pregnancy, thus showing a gradual decrease in the length of the cervix over the weeks that may or may not be associated with maternal characteristics.

In addition, particular attention should also be paid to the pressure the examiner applies to the probe, which could make a difference in the measurement taken, as well as the existence of a concomitant uterine contraction that could also modify the shape and length of the cervix.

By establishing an anatomical reference that divided the cervix into two parts, it was possible to evaluate the behavior of the measurements of these parts at different GAs. The measurement of the distance between the entrance of the uterine artery into the cervix until the internal os showed a very low variation during gestation, suggesting that the decrease in the length of the uterine cervix during pregnancy is most probably due to the shortening of the distal portion of the cervix, the vaginal portion.

The change in cervical length was the largest observed when compared with other measurements also changing during pregnancy. It seems to be the simplest and easiest to be obtained and reproduced. Some authors suggest that the initial evaluation of the cervix can be obtained also with an abdominal exam. The main objective of this study was to define reference range values of US measurements of the uterine cervix for low-risk pregnant women according to GA, from 12 to 36 weeks, and to associate these values with some obstetric, sociodemographic and lifestyle variables.

It was not the purpose of this study to assess the ability of those measurements to predict preterm birth. However, when evaluating women over 20 weeks of GA, the risk of identifying women who may progress to preterm birth is almost twice higher than when the cervix is evaluated before 20 weeks. The authors also performed a stratification by maternal risk, and concluded that the test showed a better performance for low-risk women, considering that the area under the receiver operating characteristic ROC curve was 0.

In a recent meta-analysis, Conde-Agudelo and Romero 8 identified the absence of standard reference values for cervical length as a limitation of the studies, but they concluded that the performance of a single measurement between 18 and 24 weeks was not better than the serial evaluations.

All of these findings may allow us to conclude that the expected cervical changes during pregnancy are the shortening and the enlargement of the cervix with a slight increase in volume, and that the specific values depend on some specific factors regarding the pregnant woman, such as maternal age and obstetric history.

Actual cervix length not pregnant

Actual cervix length not pregnant

Actual cervix length not pregnant